Jeff ([info]sjuhawk31) wrote,
@ 2006-08-01 14:01:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:Vertical Horizon - Give You Back
Entry tags:film

She's So Good With Her Stiletto
When a book is turned into a movie, there are, more often than not, considerable cuts to make. Multiple background characters are sometimes rolled into one sidekick, main character histories are glossed over in favor of starting in media res, and motivations are explained on the fly to make way for plot advancement. From what I understand of Lauren Weisberger's "The Devil Wears Prada," the opposite tactic was used in readying the story for the screen; the most used adjective describing her book is "glossy," as if there's not much beneath the high sheen of what's on the page. The film adaptation, while keeping much of the veneer that I assume the book has, is not quite as shallow as it lets on, and the added depth lets the actors, particularly genius Meryl Streep, a chance to breathe in their roles.

Streep plays Miranda Priestly, the all-business editor of top fashion magazine "Runway;" in the world where fashion is king, Miranda is the ice queen. Coming on board at "Runway" as one of Miranda's assistants is Andrea (Andy) Sachs (Anne Hathaway), a fashionless would-be journalist who only takes the job for networking opportunities and the lack of any other job in New York. Andy is initially overwhelmed by the job and the fact that she's completely out of place in the world of undersized waistlines and oversized eyewear, but with the help of one of the magazine's editors (Stanley Tucci as Nigel), she gets a new look and the confidence to succeed. As the demanding Miranda gives her more responsibility and pushes her to choose work and fashion over everything else, though, Andy begins to feel the strain in her relationships with her friends and live-in boyfriend (Adrian Grenier).

The majority of the movie is pure mindless fun: Miranda sends Andy on impossible tasks like securing the manuscript for an unpublished Harry Potter book, in a montage heaps her various coats and bags on Andy's desk (and later walks by unaccessorized but still says "coat, bag"), and is generally the overbearing boss who drives young naive girls in Andy's position crazy. Streep is divine in the role, breezing into the frame, chewing all available scenery, and leaving before anyone can assess the carnage. She is perfectly cast, even adding the necessary dramatic touches when things inevitably go wrong for Miranda, teaching Andy a lesson about what it's like to lead life handcuffed to your handbag.

It would be easy for Hathaway to be left in Streep's wake, but she holds her own, showing off her acting skills as Andy goes from clueless fashion disaster to Miranda's Frankenstein monster made up of genuine Italian silk and too many hours at the office. The supporting actors, especially Tucci, add a great bit of comedic flair to the whole enterprise.

Director David Frankel, who knows the genre after having directed a few episodes of "Sex and the City," paces the action nicely, letting all the right things sink in and timing all the jokes perfectly (especially the "coat, bag" which still kills me). Like this book, The Devil Wears Prada isn't the kind of film that will stick with viewers much longer than the time before the next movie they watch, but thanks to everyone involved, the time spent in the theater is certainly a blast, making Prada one of the most successful comedies of the year so far.

Rating: * * * 1/2 of 5



(Post a new comment)

I was wondering if you'd review this...
[info]bellethellama
2006-08-02 12:16 pm UTC (link)
I hated the novel this was based on--read it in an afternoon during senior year while I was on the job hunt myself, and her moans about entitlement (I mean really, what 23-year old deserves a job at The New Yorker??) and moral superiority really irritated me. I actually ended up empathizing with Anna Wintour's character at the end.

The film was marginally better--Stanley Tucci, though quite funny, was not nearly as flamboyant as he needed to be to portray the person he positioned as, and Streep was great as Priestly. The reason to go see this movie, ostenibly, is the clothes, and that's where I was really disappointed--everything felt like it came off of the Dynasty/Dallas set.

I'm really looking forward to The Nanny Diaries with Scarlett Johansson--the novel is easily the best chick-lit out there as it borrows heavily from Tom Wolfe's The Bonfire of the Vanities. The main character also runs into some struggles with her imperious employer, but usually it's because she's torn between having a personal life and the genuine affection she has for her charge.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I was wondering if you'd review this...
[info]sjuhawk31
2006-08-02 12:27 pm UTC (link)
"The reason to go see this movie, ostenibly, is the clothes..." There's no way any male is going to understand that. Without an eye for fashion (I'm wearing an outfit that is 75% Kohls right now) I just had to take it for what it was.

Not having read the book, I thought Tucci's character was good, but I wouldn't have complained if he had been more flamboyant, especially if the book called for it. My sister said that she didn't like how much they humanized Miranda, and so between her comment and yours, I'm glad that I'm among those who saw the film without reading the novel.

I can't wait for Nanny Diaries, either, but more because it has Scarlett, who I adore.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: I was wondering if you'd review this...
[info]bellethellama
2006-08-08 01:31 am UTC (link)
Of course the reason to see this movie is on account of the clothes--you don't make a film that is supposed to lambaste (or at least profile) the most influential periodical in the fashion industry and not have an expectation that the clothes will somehow be transcendent. I was delirious, thinking it was merely only arguably about the wardrobe before. That being said, you are not the primary target demographic (nor should you lose much sleep over that fact) so no one would expect you to know this. I have a funny feeling that most men seeing this film are those being dragged by some other female, so any opinion they may have regarding the clothes are either the reflected opinions of their female companions, or a complaint that they didn't have enough exposure to Anne Hathaway's goodies (especially if they saw Havoc).

Having read the book and knowing a good amount about the staff at Vogue (and more importantly/realistically, their writing style), I would have appreciated Tucci being a bit more flamboyant (in the book his character exclaims everying in capital letters) and a bit more chic--I just feel he was toned down not to offend anybody. That mentality seemed to permeate throughout the entire film, as the costuming (by Pat Field, also of Sex and the City fame) obviously was comprised of pieces that wouldn't offend anyone, and therefore didn't include any labels that would be considered chic among fashion lovers (as they clearly didn't want to offend their editorial support).

Anyway, have you read The Nanny Diaries? If you've read (and subsequently enjoyed) The Bonfire of the Vanities by Tom Wolfe, you'd definetely dig it. It's number two on my list of the only five chick lit books you ever have to read if you're a guy, which clearly makes it worthwhile.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: I was wondering if you'd review this...
[info]sjuhawk31
2006-08-08 03:45 am UTC (link)
With such high reccomendation from you, someone whose literary opinion I hold in extremely high regard, I'll make it next on my list of "to reads."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…